poem #3: no. (cute edits, though)
poem #4: no.
And with that, I'm going to have to graciously bow out of the challenge.
So early, it's true. My attention span is a fickle thing, easily grasped and just as easily swayed.
Poetry evaluation just doesn't match my time-wasting mantra, where this blog is concerned.
It's a very clever idea though, and I do thank you for thinking of me, Robert.
I would propose that you continue posting your poetic discoveries on your blog and open up the challenge to all readers, many of whom will have much more entertaining criticism than I on the subject.
In light of all this and in conclusion, I do retract my statement of two years (or whenever) ago. It's not that I don't like poetry, i like the poetry that I like.
Thank you for an eye-opening experience.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Four Poems! indeed. But however many Deep Literary Issues might have been discussed along the way, the contest was supposed to be Fun, and if it's Not Fun it Stops.
I invented it as a tease, a challenge, and an entertainment. It's already served another purpose: I suspect you'll look at poetry a little more closely (while continuing to like what you like, as you should) and I've started an exploration to expose, and begin to resolve, my own artistic/critical complacencies.
Meanwhile, as it hardly got started, I suggest we split the bet and owe two bucks apiece to a deserving charity. How about: buy a free drink for an artist? Any one will do. Theatre, lit'r'ry, visual... Seems right.
A good thing to do on all occasions anyway.
Robert
Post a Comment